Movie 43

[aruif]

What on earth was THAT??

THIS!!!

I will never get that time back! wahhhhhhh.

At least I walked out of Top Cat... i was so close to leaving on this but hoped it would get better. It only got worse.

How on earth did anyone think that this would be good, who read those scripts, the concept, the whole thing?

-6/10

[thejason40]

I think a major problem with this film is it has 11 different directors, so no final vision.....and it isn't funny.

[KKO]

Now I want to watch it to see how bad it is

[Jason_Tarry]

Movie 43. Well, where to begin. This is a messed up movie. If you have this type of mindset, then you will love it, if not you will probably walk out.

Break down of Movie 43
Scene 1: Testicles *****
Scene 2: Truth or Dare *****
Scene 3: Home Schooling *****
Scene 4: 18 month Relationship stage *****
Scene 5: Leprechauns *****
Scene 6: Children in Machines *
Scene 7: Super Heroes Speed Dating *
Scene 8: Period ***
Scene 9: IBABE ***
Scene 10: Basket Ball game ****
Scene 10: Over all Story, putting viruses on brother computer whilst he searches for Movie 43 ***
Scene 11: Man and his Cat ***

[Beate]

http://bestforfilm.com/film-news/movie- ... n-average/

[elski]

Movie 43: why did so many Hollywood stars sign up for the humiliation?

Critics have described grossout comedy Movie 43 as the worst film of all time. So how did the likes of Halle Berry, Kate Winslet and Hugh Jackman end up starring in it?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2013/jan ... CMP=twt_gu

[andrews]

I think that more fun will be had reading the reviews in the newspapers. In Tuesday's Independent, the heading read: The Citizen Kane of Awful". Critics have jokingly asked if the stars were tricked into taking part. "Was someone holding Kate Winslet's children hostage? Threatening to release compromising pictures of Emma Stone? Did Richard Gere or Hugh Jackman have gambling debts?" wrote David Edelstein, movie critic for Vulture.

Richard Roeper, film critic for the Chicago Sun Times did not "see a redeeming molecule" in the film.

It did receive a positive review: Michael O'Sullivan form the Washington Post gave it three and a half starsout of four, saying that the film opened a "new, unexplored dimension of awfulness where bad is good, and what some might call obscene and offensive is awesome."

I'll give this one a miss.

[elski]

it is funny to hear that it took four years and he practically hunted/wore some stars down to be in it.

[The Sparrow]

I feel hunted and worn down for watching it!

[raj101]

being a hollywood star is not a sign of intelligence, its a sign of being desperate enough to do anything to be famous, so Movie 43 had a wide net by default.