Star Trek Beyond
Re: Star Trek Beyond
I haven't been to an Imax screening before so have really nothing to compare it with. I was glad we sat near the back as the screen was very large. I must admit the screen was so large sometimes my eyes were darting all over the place trying to capture all the action. I did feel sometimes like I was suffering a bit of vertigo looking over the top of spacecrafts so it does feel very real. I did enjoy the large screen but I don't think I would want to p*y nearly £18 off peak and £20 peak time for a ticket!
-
- The Third Man
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 4:43 am
- Old post count: 0
- Preferred Cinemas: London, Leicester
- Location: London
Re: Star Trek Beyond
hmm as someone who goes to empire imax for like 90% of the imax movies i have to object, the empire imax screen is infact wider than the waterloo imax screen (by only 0.5meter if i remember) which in turn is much wider than the "lie-max" screen at odeon kingston...raj101 wrote:that Leicester Square screen is one of the most unconvincing IMAX screens I've seen. Sure its high, but its width leaves something to be desired, largely down to the cheat curvature of the screen that allows it to claim a width that it really doesn't possess. Way less than its claim as one of the largest in the UK.
If I'd pa*d for a ticket there I'd be asking for my money back, the Kingston screen is much wider and that's one of the "lesser" IMAXs.
infact the empire imax screen is so wide that when watching (2.4ratio)cinemascope movies there in 3D you have to sit in the last 4-5rows to get the screen to "fit" inview of both your 3d glasses lenses and therefore get the 3d effect to work properly.
just so you know, all the odeon imax screens are deemed "lie-max" except the waterloo one which is a real imax screen owned by the BFI but just "run" by odeon the past 4 years.
- raj101
- 8 1/2
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:08 am
- Old post count: 0
- Preferred Cinemas: kingston, wimbledon, wandsworth, fulham
Re: Star Trek Beyond
RandomHajile wrote:hmm as someone who goes to empire imax for like 90% of the imax movies i have to object, the empire imax screen is infact wider than the waterloo imax screen (by only 0.5meter if i remember) which in turn is much wider than the "lie-max" screen at odeon kingston...raj101 wrote:that Leicester Square screen is one of the most unconvincing IMAX screens I've seen. Sure its high, but its width leaves something to be desired, largely down to the cheat curvature of the screen that allows it to claim a width that it really doesn't possess. Way less than its claim as one of the largest in the UK.
If I'd pa*d for a ticket there I'd be asking for my money back, the Kingston screen is much wider and that's one of the "lesser" IMAXs.
infact the empire imax screen is so wide that when watching (2.4ratio)cinemascope movies there in 3D you have to sit in the last 4-5rows to get the screen to "fit" inview of both your 3d glasses lenses and therefore get the 3d effect to work properly.
just so you know, all the odeon imax screens are deemed "lie-max" except the waterloo one which is a real imax screen owned by the BFI but just "run" by odeon the past 4 years.
well it might have something to do with us sitting near the bottom due to availability of seats, but the curvature plays a part in shortening the claimed length in practice though its clearly a long screen physically.
fav 5 films of the year - Tenet, Bill n Ted 3, Invisible Man, JoJo Rabbit, ?
-
- 8 1/2
- Posts: 6895
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:15 pm
- Old post count: 0
Re: Star Trek Beyond
I thought all IMAX screens were curved?
Free Films Seen 2016
Jan - 7. Feb - 15. Mar - 39
Apr - 28. May - 41. June - 36
July - 39. Aug - 27. Sept - 42
Oct- 12 and counting. = 286
Jan - 7. Feb - 15. Mar - 39
Apr - 28. May - 41. June - 36
July - 39. Aug - 27. Sept - 42
Oct- 12 and counting. = 286
- alythonian
- Se7en
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:15 pm
- Old post count: 19
- Preferred Cinemas: Edinburgh; Livingston; Dunfermline
- Location: Edinburgh
Re: Star Trek Beyond
Just back.
Really enjoyed this. Very clever script by Simon Pegg, just enough subtle humour and in jokes!
I'm not a Trekkie at all, but thud was good fun entertaining get away from it all 2 hours.
8/10
Really enjoyed this. Very clever script by Simon Pegg, just enough subtle humour and in jokes!
I'm not a Trekkie at all, but thud was good fun entertaining get away from it all 2 hours.
8/10
Alythonian
- elski
- 9 1/2 Weeks
- Posts: 14287
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:47 pm
- Old post count: 1223
- Location: Sheffield/London
Re: Star Trek Beyond
I love all the dubsmash clips of the cast it certainly looks like they had fun on set.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Member No. 25 of the "100 free films in 2017" club! 195 films seen!!
List: http://www.fmuk.org.uk/forum/viewtopic. ... 10#p386907
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Member No. 25 of the "100 free films in 2016" club! 170 seen!
List: http://www.fmuk.org.uk/forum/viewtopic. ... 59#p375395
2015 -210 films seen! List: http://www.fmuk.org.uk/forum/viewtopic. ... 20#p354785
2014 - 178 films seen! List: http://www.fmuk.org.uk/forum/viewtopic. ... 20#p321617
2013 - 104 films seen!
2012 - 103 films seen
2011 - 110 films seen
2010 - 82 films seen
2009 - 72 films seen
2008 - 41 films seen
Member No. 25 of the "100 free films in 2017" club! 195 films seen!!
List: http://www.fmuk.org.uk/forum/viewtopic. ... 10#p386907
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Member No. 25 of the "100 free films in 2016" club! 170 seen!
List: http://www.fmuk.org.uk/forum/viewtopic. ... 59#p375395
2015 -210 films seen! List: http://www.fmuk.org.uk/forum/viewtopic. ... 20#p354785
2014 - 178 films seen! List: http://www.fmuk.org.uk/forum/viewtopic. ... 20#p321617
2013 - 104 films seen!
2012 - 103 films seen
2011 - 110 films seen
2010 - 82 films seen
2009 - 72 films seen
2008 - 41 films seen
- raj101
- 8 1/2
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:08 am
- Old post count: 0
- Preferred Cinemas: kingston, wimbledon, wandsworth, fulham
Re: Star Trek Beyond
Damit Jim I'm a doctor not an IMAX expert.The Sparrow wrote:I thought all IMAX screens were curved?
fav 5 films of the year - Tenet, Bill n Ted 3, Invisible Man, JoJo Rabbit, ?
-
- 8 1/2
- Posts: 6895
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:15 pm
- Old post count: 0
Re: Star Trek Beyond
raj101 wrote:Damit Jim I'm a doctor not an IMAX expert.The Sparrow wrote:I thought all IMAX screens were curved?
LMPEO (laugh my pointy ears off)
Free Films Seen 2016
Jan - 7. Feb - 15. Mar - 39
Apr - 28. May - 41. June - 36
July - 39. Aug - 27. Sept - 42
Oct- 12 and counting. = 286
Jan - 7. Feb - 15. Mar - 39
Apr - 28. May - 41. June - 36
July - 39. Aug - 27. Sept - 42
Oct- 12 and counting. = 286
-
- The Third Man
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 4:43 am
- Old post count: 0
- Preferred Cinemas: London, Leicester
- Location: London
Re: Star Trek Beyond
I saw it at 3d at vues extreme screen in Westfield, which as its a very dark looking film and the xtreme screen is not very bright, and the 3d glasses made it darker ect... It didn't help the experience, I should of watched it 2d or in 3d at imax as its much brighter.
Anyways the movie is quite fast paced with scenes on top on scenes, and fast editing made me feel like I may of missed something and would have to rewatch it.
Overall I liked it, yes the story is a bit cheasy, and felt a pit like "the motion picture" but after the trailers made out it was going to be rubbish I was surprised it was watchable to me.
I'll watch it again for sure but at imax laser.
7/10
Anyways the movie is quite fast paced with scenes on top on scenes, and fast editing made me feel like I may of missed something and would have to rewatch it.
Overall I liked it, yes the story is a bit cheasy, and felt a pit like "the motion picture" but after the trailers made out it was going to be rubbish I was surprised it was watchable to me.
I'll watch it again for sure but at imax laser.
7/10
Re: Star Trek Beyond
Is this one actually worth a cinema ticket? Also, does anyone know if it was shot stereoscopically? Thanks.