Taking Woodstock
-
the fox
- Phase IV
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:45 pm
- Old post count: 9
- Preferred Cinemas: Nottingham, Mansfield, Loughborough, Derby, Leicester
- Location: East Midlands
Re: Taking Woodstock
Saw this AT CINEWORLD Nottingham, wasn’t expecting much after seeing the trailer but hey it was free. Cinema was about half full with some late comers in about 10 mins into the film. Have to say I was surprised on how much I enjoyed the film despite the few slow bits, it still made me laugh. Can’t believe how Richard Thomas looks now he used to play John Boy in the Waltons many moons ago.
Member No. 14 of the "100 free films in 2019" club! 0 seen 100 to go.
20 Films seen in 2018, 46 Films seen in 2017, 43 Films seen in 2016, 59 Films seen in 2015, 65 Films seen in 2014,
78 Films seen in 2013, 73 Films seen in 2012, 54 Films seen in 2011, 58 Films seen in 2010 and 32 Films seen in 2009
20 Films seen in 2018, 46 Films seen in 2017, 43 Films seen in 2016, 59 Films seen in 2015, 65 Films seen in 2014,
78 Films seen in 2013, 73 Films seen in 2012, 54 Films seen in 2011, 58 Films seen in 2010 and 32 Films seen in 2009
-
sparklysparkles
Re: Taking Woodstock
Hated this! Was at Cineworld Glasgow and it can only have been about 1/10th full. 1 out of 10 - I think it didn't work at all with the split screens, random nudity, and rambling plot. Got so bored.
-
soonforgotten
- Se7en
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:14 am
- Old post count: 0
- Preferred Cinemas: any London ones except Wandsworth & Enfield
- I have tickets for: The Iron Lady, War Horse & a several vouchers
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Taking Woodstock
Saw this at WIQ which was maybe a third full. After seeing it, I wished I had opted for Jennifer's Body instead. It was just boring. Imelda Staunton was the only thing worth watching in it. The lack of music was mind-boggling. It was just flat and there really wasn't much to be interested in. I'm glad I didn't p*y to see this.
102 Different free films seen in 2010 plus 2 repeat viewings and a few tv show screenings... not too shabby. Thanks to everyone for their contributions here.
100 Free Films in 2011 Member #6: 181/100
My top 10 films of 2011
100 Free Films in 2012 Member #6: 210/100
Why not visit my film blog?
100 Free Films in 2011 Member #6: 181/100
My top 10 films of 2011
100 Free Films in 2012 Member #6: 210/100
Why not visit my film blog?
-
splodgy
Re: Taking Woodstock
I was quite disappointed by this film, although I'm not really sure what I was expecting. The film was too long and there was too much just walking through the fields. I didn't feel there was much of a story and there weren't many funny bits. I wouldn't have wanted to p*y to watch it.
-
opas
- Phase IV
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:29 am
- Old post count: 157
- Preferred Cinemas: Central London (All West End), East London (WIQ, Stratford), North London (Islington), South East London (Greenwich, Surrey Quays), Cineworld Ilford and West London (Shepherds Bush, Whiteleys)
Re: Taking Woodstock
Can't believe WIQ wasn't full! I really wanted to watch this but I couldn't get tickets. I was subjected to Jennifer's Body instead!
Member No. 16 of the "100 free films in 2016" club
3 seen / 97 to go
41 films seen in 2015, 55 films seen in 2013, 72 free films seen in 2012
60 free films seen in 2011, 57 free films seen in 2010
51 free films seen in 2009, 47 free films seen in 2008
3 seen / 97 to go
41 films seen in 2015, 55 films seen in 2013, 72 free films seen in 2012
60 free films seen in 2011, 57 free films seen in 2010
51 free films seen in 2009, 47 free films seen in 2008
-
spuckle
Re: Taking Woodstock
Really disappointed in this movie, saw it at Cineworld Glasgow and it was about a fifth full only.
Promising storyline that sadly failed to deliver for me, 6/10.
Promising storyline that sadly failed to deliver for me, 6/10.
-
Ms Thrifty
Re: Taking Woodstock
I'm still surprised by the low ratings here and wonder if it appeals more to older viewers? Unlike others, I didn't mind the lack of music, as the music of the time doesn't appeal to me anyway and besides, is so well-known - almost too familiar to use, in fact. It will be very interesting to see what the professional critics say.